mirror of
https://github.com/FlipsideCrypto/near-models-nlq.git
synced 2026-02-06 10:57:48 +00:00
use existing daily staked supply model instead
This commit is contained in:
parent
26389d2aff
commit
0c5e3c6807
@ -51,16 +51,29 @@ daily_locked_and_staked_supply AS (
|
||||
),
|
||||
daily_staked_supply AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
*
|
||||
date_day AS utc_date,
|
||||
balance AS total_staked_supply
|
||||
FROM
|
||||
{{ ref('silver__atlas_supply_daily_staked_supply') }}
|
||||
{{ ref('silver__pool_balance_daily') }}
|
||||
),
|
||||
daily_total_supply AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
end_time :: DATE AS utc_date,
|
||||
total_near_supply
|
||||
FROM
|
||||
{{ ref('silver__atlas_supply_epochs') }}
|
||||
qualify ROW_NUMBER() over (
|
||||
PARTITION BY end_time :: DATE
|
||||
ORDER BY
|
||||
end_time DESC
|
||||
) = 1
|
||||
),
|
||||
daily_supply_stats AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
s.utc_date,
|
||||
s.total_supply,
|
||||
ts.total_supply,
|
||||
s.total_staked_supply,
|
||||
s.total_supply - s.total_staked_supply AS total_nonstaked_supply,
|
||||
ts.total_supply - s.total_staked_supply AS total_nonstaked_supply,
|
||||
ls.total_locked_supply,
|
||||
ls.locked_and_staked_supply,
|
||||
GREATEST(
|
||||
@ -78,6 +91,8 @@ daily_supply_stats AS (
|
||||
daily_staked_supply AS s
|
||||
LEFT JOIN daily_locked_and_staked_supply AS ls
|
||||
ON ls.utc_date = s.utc_date
|
||||
LEFT JOIN daily_total_supply AS ts
|
||||
ON ts.utc_date = s.utc_date
|
||||
),
|
||||
output AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3,9 +3,17 @@
|
||||
cluster_by = ["utc_date"],
|
||||
unique_key = "atlas_daily_staked_supply_id",
|
||||
merge_exclude_columns = ["inserted_timestamp"],
|
||||
tags = ['atlas', 'atlas_supply']
|
||||
tags = ['atlas', 'atlas_supply'],
|
||||
enabled = False
|
||||
) }}
|
||||
|
||||
{#
|
||||
Note - seems like a more complicated way to get to the result in silver__pool_balances(_daily). Both look for logs that emit the updated staked total,
|
||||
but this query is calculating extra proposer and epoch stats and not using them.
|
||||
Unnecessary compute, possibly from a separate analytical process.
|
||||
The numbers do seem to differ, but individual pool balances in my silver table match near-staking exactly.
|
||||
#}
|
||||
|
||||
WITH receipts AS (
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
@ -27,18 +35,26 @@ WHERE
|
||||
),
|
||||
function_call AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
*
|
||||
distinct tx_hash
|
||||
FROM
|
||||
{{ ref('silver__actions_events_function_call_s3') }}
|
||||
WHERE
|
||||
method_name IN (
|
||||
'ping',
|
||||
'stake',
|
||||
'unstake',
|
||||
'stake_all',
|
||||
'unstake_all',
|
||||
'deposit_and_stake'
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
{% if is_incremental() %}
|
||||
WHERE
|
||||
_inserted_timestamp :: DATE >= (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
MAX(utc_date) - INTERVAL '2 days'
|
||||
FROM
|
||||
{{ this }}
|
||||
)
|
||||
AND _inserted_timestamp :: DATE >= (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
MAX(utc_date) - INTERVAL '2 days'
|
||||
FROM
|
||||
{{ this }}
|
||||
)
|
||||
{% endif %}
|
||||
),
|
||||
blocks AS (
|
||||
@ -96,15 +112,6 @@ staking_actions AS (
|
||||
tx_hash
|
||||
FROM
|
||||
function_call
|
||||
WHERE
|
||||
method_name IN (
|
||||
'ping',
|
||||
'stake',
|
||||
'unstake',
|
||||
'stake_all',
|
||||
'unstake_all',
|
||||
'deposit_and_stake'
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
AND LEFT(
|
||||
l.value :: STRING,
|
||||
@ -115,7 +122,8 @@ staking_actions AS (
|
||||
ORDER BY
|
||||
block_timestamp DESC
|
||||
) = 1
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
,
|
||||
proposals AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
b.block_id,
|
||||
|
||||
@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ near:
|
||||
account: "{{ env_var('SF_ACCOUNT') }}"
|
||||
# User/password auth
|
||||
user: "{{ env_var('SF_USERNAME') }}"
|
||||
authenticator: externalbrowser
|
||||
password: "{{ env_var('SF_PASSWORD') }}"
|
||||
role: "{{ env_var('SF_ROLE') }}"
|
||||
schema: "{{ env_var('SF_SCHEMA') }}"
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user