4f79980e0e
This PR refactors notebooks to support the upcoming Keyword Search GA. The main goal is to make it easier to switch to a new default pattern type without breaking existing notebooks. **Before** - pattern type and version were hardcoded in several places **After** - Each notebook has a read-only pattern type as determined by the new column `notebooks.pattern_type` (defaults to "standard"). **Notes** - Notebooks call the Stream API via various helper functions. `patternType` and `version` are both required parameters, which is redundant, because version acts as a default pattern type already. I left a TODO in the code for that. I don't want to change this as part of this PR because the change would get very big and affect too much code outside of Notebooks. - We support rendering notebooks with `.snb.md` extension. Unlike notebooks stored in our db, we cannot migrate those files. **Q&A** Q: How does this help for Keyword Search GA? A: Once we default to keyword search, we can change the default of `notebooks.pattern_type` from "standard" to "keyword". Existing notebooks will still work with "standard". New Notebooks will use "keyword". Q: How can customers migrate existing notebooks to a new version? A: Use the existing "Copy to My Notebooks" function of Notebooks. The copied notebook will have the current default pattern type. Test plan: - existing tests pass - manual testing - I created a couple of notebooks with all the different block types and verified via the network tab that all requests to the Stream API have the proper pattern type. I played around with different values in `notebooks.pattern_type` to make sure that the request parameters change. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| branded | ||
| browser | ||
| build-config | ||
| client-api | ||
| codeintellify | ||
| cody-context-filters-test-dataset | ||
| cody-shared | ||
| cody-ui | ||
| common | ||
| eslint-plugin-wildcard | ||
| extension-api | ||
| extension-api-types | ||
| http-client | ||
| jetbrains | ||
| observability-client | ||
| observability-server | ||
| shared | ||
| storybook | ||
| template-parser | ||
| testing | ||
| vscode | ||
| web | ||
| web-sveltekit | ||
| wildcard | ||
| BUILD.bazel | ||
| README.md | ||
Frontend packages
List
- web: The web application deployed to http://sourcegraph.com/
- browser: The Sourcegraph browser extension adds tooltips to code on different code hosts.
- vscode: The Sourcegraph VS Code extension.
- extension-api: The Sourcegraph extension API types for the Sourcegraph extensions. Published as
sourcegraph. - extension-api-types: The Sourcegraph extension API types for client applications that embed Sourcegraph extensions and need to communicate with them. Published as
@sourcegraph/extension-api-types. - sandboxes: All demos-mvp (minimum viable product) for the Sourcegraph web application.
- shared: Contains common TypeScript/React/SCSS client code shared between the browser extension and the web app. Everything in this package is code-host agnostic.
- branded: Contains React components and implements the visual design language we use across our web app and e.g. in the options menu of the browser extension. Over time, components from
sharedandbrandedpackages should be moved into thewildcardpackage. - wildcard: Package that encapsulates storybook configuration and contains our Wildcard design system components. If we're using a component in two or more different areas (e.g.
web-appandbrowser-extension) then it should live in thewildcardpackage. Otherwise the components should be better colocated with the code where they're actually used. - search: Search-related code that may be shared between all clients, both branded (e.g. web, VS Code extension) and unbranded (e.g. browser extension)
- storybook: Storybook configuration.
Further migration plan
-
Fix circular dependency in TS project-references graph wildcard package should not rely on web and probably shared, branded too. Ideally it should be an independent self-contained package.
-
Decide on package naming and update existing package names. Especially it should be done for a shared package because we have multiple
sharedfolders inside of other packages. It's hard to understand from where dependency is coming from and it's not possible to refactor import paths using find-and-replace. -
Investigate if we can painlessly switch to
npmworkspaces. -
Content of packages shared and branded should be moved to wildcard and refactored using the latest FE rules and conventions. Having different packages clearly communicates the migration plan. Developers first should look for components in the wildcard package and then fall-back to legacy packages if wildcard doesn't have the solution to their problem yet.
-
shared contains utility functions, types, polyfills, etc which is not a part of the Wildcard component library. These modules should be moved into utils package and other new packages: e.g. api for GraphQL client and type generators, etc.
-
Packages should use package name (e.g.
@sourcegraph/wildcard) for imports instead of the relative paths (e.g.../../../../wildcard/src/components/Markdown) to avoid long relative-paths and make dependency graph between packages clear. (Typescript will warn if packages have circular dependencies). It's easy to refactor such isolated packages, extract functionality into new ones, or even into new repositories.